Which of the following signatures is acceptable?

The correct choice, which states that the signature is electronically signed and authenticated by John Smith, MD, stands out as the most acceptable option in the context of RADV audits. This is because electronic signatures that are authenticated provide a verified way to confirm the identity of the signer. The mention of "authenticated" indicates that there are measures in place to ensure that the signature genuinely belongs to John Smith, MD, adding a layer of security and trust to the document.

In medical records and other official documentation, authenticity is crucial, especially in contexts subject to audits like RADV, where validation of data integrity and proper documentation is a central focus. The inclusion of the title "MD" further indicates the professional status of the individual, ensuring that the signature comes from a qualified provider.

The other options do not meet these criteria. For instance, a signed but not read document lacks assurance regarding the acknowledgment of content, while an electronically produced name without a signature does not confirm authentication or intent. A signature stamp, while it may represent the signature of an individual, does not carry the same weight of authenticity as a personal electronic signature, which must involve the signer’s intent and acknowledgment. Thus, the electronic signature that is both signed and authenticated is acceptable and aligns with